Unexplained Inc.

September Case Study ft. Angel Card Amy...The Conjuring 2 (2016)

September 03, 2021 Phantom Phil Episode 78
Unexplained Inc.
September Case Study ft. Angel Card Amy...The Conjuring 2 (2016)
Show Notes


In this episode Angel Card Amy and Phantom Phil break down the popular and profitable sequel to the original Conjuring...which they studied back in May 2021...find out why they both like this film a little bit better plus these tidbits...

- The thought provoking underlying themes of the film
- The effective use of jump scares and camera focus
- Phantom Phil cringes @ Ed Warren's Elivs impersonation
- Did the movie nail down the characters or the real events themselves
- An in-depth study at the Enfield Poltergeist case this film was based on
- Were the Hodgson family legitimately haunted or was it all an elaborate hoax?
- Could their unexplained events be a mass manifestation of negative energy surrounding their home and their lives?
- In what ways is the film historically accurate and also way off balance at the same time?
- What did the Warren's actually do (or not do) in this investigation off of the silver screen?
- Which odd act of synchronicity happened during the recording that made Phil and Amy burst into laughter?

Maurice Gross...investigator of the Enfield Poltergeist getting hammered on British television by a skeptic professor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBSa0siFtAs

The highly debated Hodgson sisters interview...is a demonic entity really speaking through Janet? Or is this some kind of a strange vocal trick? You be the judge...either way...it's very very strange:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azzDY15ck80

Follow Unexplained Inc. here:
www.thephantomhub.com
Unexplained Inc on Facebook
@phantomphil3 on Twitter
unexplained_inc or phantom_phil_unexplained on IG